Why we still use — The King James Bible



For an excellent article go to:

A Creationist's Defense of the King James Bible

by Henry M. Morris


at: http://www.icr.org/


Most older concordance, thesaraus, lexicon, research and commentary books reference the KJV. Because of its internal consistency the KJV makes it easier to: process comparative word studies, to compare various usages, examine the contexts of key words or phrases, or search for a verse by key words or phrases. It is also in the public domain and may be freely cited and copied.



Reference list:

Our Babel of Bibles, David Lyle Jeffrey at: http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=25-02-029-f

For KJV:
Statement of Ambassador College Concerning the KJV Issue at: http://bible-truth.org/kjvstatement.html

BIBLE TEXTS AND VERSIONS at: http://wayoflife.org/database/textsversionsheader.html

Would you take a magic marker to your Bible and cross out words from passages? Westcott and Hort's Magic Marker Binge! at: http://av1611.com/kjbp/charts/themagicmarker.html & http://av1611.com/kjbp/charts/themagicmarker2.html

MY POSITION ON THE KING JAMES BIBLE, David Cloud at: http://wayoflife.org/database/mypositiononkjv.html

The King James Bible Defended, Dr. Edward F. Hills, Ph.D. at: http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/kjvdefen.htm


Against KJV:
A Review of "TOUCH NOT THE UNCLEAN THING" by David Sorenson, Doug Kutilek at: http://www.kjvonly.org/doug/kutilek_review_touch_not_the_unclean_thing.htm